So you want to know how to address the question:
What if my group, local, state, or national does not agree to my entitlement or have a notable representative that I can openly contact or have access to the body for my pet project?
Highly controversial but effective is the use of a Unity Clause. Such a clause can be very simple or complex depending on the variables involved. It is suggested like many founding documents to be kept simple at first and later defined by sub-committees or a judicial committee from within the body having neutral stance and its own rules and closed network. No member of a Judicial Committee should be an officer in another capacity. In fact, to have a fair and just body, no officer should hold more than one elected office at a time as it is a centralization of power that has been in the past the most abusive to membership growth for all organizations.
An example of abusiveness can be seen here NC of the SP of the USA. Notice the National Committee's members. See the last name "Pason"? Now read lower and read the same name again under the title of National Secretary. Read even lower at the small print to read "the NAC is composed of the National Secretary" so this makes three different offices by one person. Now look at the top of the list to read "Pason" again! A relative perhaps? Conflict of interest in the same level of governence? Centralization of power? Now try to contact someone through the party's website to discover all communications go through "Pason." It seems "Pason" limits the growth by simply holding too many offices. Now how long has "Pason" held these offices?
What any small group starting out can do is file a legal charter with the state under articles of incorporation for a not-for-profit status. This gives a legal standing to the local.
By using a unity clause (example) to say, "We, democratic socialists and social democrats respectively using both terms synonymously for Socialists and acting by democratic means excepting all heirs to the former Socialist Party of America..." While this example is too basic it is an idea and start to whatever your group's local needs are. Anything that creates a growth has growing pains and disagreements. The best means for unity is having a manageable structured plan, think bylaws.
No matter what the group all of them should follow the U.S. Constitution whereas it guarantees the right to a republican formation of government. In this case, an elected Representative that can be openly and publicly contacted and is known for a designated area.
Questions to consider or ask:
Every member of an organization has a legal right to every other member to access a quorum. In some cases this can be very social and in action be direct democracy of one organization by using parliamentary procedure to take motions from the Chair and forcing the whole body to vote on your pet project. By appealing to the body it removes those little clique groups that have more of a tendency to abuse other members than tendency to grow your common organization.
Questions to consider or ask: